

Is a significant change of circumstances enough any more to reopen final parenting orders?
Section 65DAAA brought about material changes to the application of the rule in Rice & Asplund, as I explained here a few months ago. In Radecki & Radecki [2024] FedCFamC1A 246, the Full Court sought to resolve the problems created by the new section, boldly asserting that because the Parliament intended to make no change to the law, therefore it didn’t. The s.65DAAA quandary However, it is now quite clear that the statute has brought about a substantial amendment to the law.
By Patrick Parkinson AM










